On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:59 PM, helix84 <heli...@centrum.sk> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Ronayne > <ronayne.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ah-Ha! OK, let's use ISO 639 (maybe use the Library of Congress version that >> looks an awful lot like 639-2, maybe not). Pretty much all the collection is >> European dating as early as 13th century (thus, Old French and English in >> various forms plus some others). I did find a ISO 639-6 site (that you don't >> have to pay for) at ISO 639-6 and it's easy enough to dig through, so, what >> the heck, go for it. > > IIRC, LoC uses the ISO 639-2 alpha 3 *bibliographic* variant (or > probably the standard arose from what libraries used). Don't just take > my word for it, though.
By that I didn't mean to imply that you shouldn't use ISO 639-6, I only tried to clarify your usage of "ISO 639" which is a vague term because it encompasses a whole family of different standards. Regards, ~~helix84 Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
