On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Janine Costanzo wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Denise Paolucci > <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is pretty easy, actually; LJ just never finished totally >> migrating comment replies to using the notification system instead of >> the old system. Replies to your comments in other journals still use >> the old way. We have a ticket open to finish the migration. > > You're right that it was never finished, but it's not pretty easy. :) > As far as I understand it, the reason that replies to your comments > in other journals are not ESN-ified is because the table structure for > ESN events does not actually support this case (i.e. three > parameters--journal, commenter, and person being replied to). I have > not actually looked at the code too much, so I may be wrong on the > specifics, but back at 6A this was the reason I was given for why it > never happened. Not that it's impossible to fix, of course, just that > it's not straightforward.
Surely it should be easy enough as an invisible automatic subscription to the thread, no? --D -- Denise Paolucci [email protected] Dreamwidth Studios: Open Source, open expression, open operations. Coming soon! _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
