On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Rachel Walmsley <[email protected]> wrote: > To my mind, there are two things that we want to do: > > 1. Give poeople the tools to post what they want, how they want. > 2. Give people the tools to read what they want, how they want. > > It's a similar sort of logic to letting people style their journas > however they want, but giving people ?style=mine so they can read in > whatever style they want. > > What I expect this will lead to: > > 1. Fully integrated twitter posting that doesn't rely on a third party > (or rather, a fourth party, since it has to involve Twitter itself). > 2. Reading page filters based on tag. This would mean not only that I > could subscribe to (for instances) "all posts by denise that don't have > the tag 'twitter'" but also "posts by mark but only those tagged > 'dreamwidth' or 'perl'".
And your vision of "post what they want, how they want" implies not just special-casing Twitter, but perhaps allowing automatic scheduled import from a variety of other social media services (like Delicious, Flickr, YouTube). _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
