Also, maybe the possibility to lj-cut or hide certain posts on the flist when the user wants to. Sort of like a kill switch for comments, but in this case, it would collapse the content of a post.
This would be useful at work, or when there's a a huge post that someone won't lj-cut on a comm (or when there are 15 posts on the same topic and you've gone into KILL KILL KILL mode about the spammage). -g Rachel Walmsley <[email protected]> wrote: > To my mind, there are two things that we want to do: > > 1. Give poeople the tools to post what they want, how they want. > 2. Give people the tools to read what they want, how they want. > > It's a similar sort of logic to letting people style their journas > however they want, but giving people ?style=mine so they can read in > whatever style they want. > > What I expect this will lead to: > > 1. Fully integrated twitter posting that doesn't rely on a third party > (or rather, a fourth party, since it has to involve Twitter itself). > 2. Reading page filters based on tag. This would mean not only that I > could subscribe to (for instances) "all posts by denise that don't have > the tag 'twitter'" but also "posts by mark but only those tagged > 'dreamwidth' or 'perl'". > > This isn't something that we'd be able to implement quickly, but IMO > it's what we should be aiming for. > > I'll also add that it's not our job to solve social problems. If Alice > thinks Bob is being rude by posting lots of twitter entries but Bob > thinks Alice is being rude by refusing to read them, that's something > Alice and Bob will hav eto work out between temselves, and not something > we can help with. > _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
