2009/4/16 Rachel Walmsley <[email protected]>: > To my mind, there are two things that we want to do: > > 1. Give poeople the tools to post what they want, how they want. > 2. Give people the tools to read what they want, how they want. > > It's a similar sort of logic to letting people style their journas > however they want, but giving people ?style=mine so they can read in > whatever style they want. > > What I expect this will lead to: > > 1. Fully integrated twitter posting that doesn't rely on a third party > (or rather, a fourth party, since it has to involve Twitter itself). > 2. Reading page filters based on tag. This would mean not only that I > could subscribe to (for instances) "all posts by denise that don't have > the tag 'twitter'" but also "posts by mark but only those tagged > 'dreamwidth' or 'perl'". > > This isn't something that we'd be able to implement quickly, but IMO > it's what we should be aiming for. > > I'll also add that it's not our job to solve social problems. If Alice > thinks Bob is being rude by posting lots of twitter entries but Bob > thinks Alice is being rude by refusing to read them, that's something > Alice and Bob will hav eto work out between temselves, and not something > we can help with.
^ this, exactly. -- Katie Sutton www.xugglybug.co.uk "The ‘Net is a waste of time, and that’s exactly what’s right about it." ~ William Gibson _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
