On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Andrew Ducker wrote: > Azalais Aranxta wrote: > > There really is a point at which there should be a force-cut, > > I agree - _if_ the reader has specifically chosen to tick that button.
I'm not opposed to there being a button. If there is really somebody out there who is willing to read 40 pages of anything on their reading page without a cut because the integrity of the OP's intentions is that important to them, and that's you, my hat's off to you :) But I do think it's an accessibility issue for a lot of folks when you get to the really loooooooooooooooong posts. > I don't want DW changing _anything_ about a post without me having > already agreed to it. If I haven't ticked the "OMG, I can't stand > pictures!" checkbox then I should get the post _as the original poster > intended_. If I were that attached to making people read things as I intended them to, personally, I would not post to a journalling service, I'd blog, so that people would have to look at it in my colour scheme and my layout and my everything. When you post to a journalling service you are pretty much signing on to the idea that people are going to look at your stuff through style=mine, on reading pages, with or without embedded content... If I cared enough to care whether people force-cut my long posts, I would post some other kind of place I guess. YMMV and obviously does I guess. Azalais :/ **************************************************************** Azalais Aranxta (~malfoy) ataniell93 on LiveJournal and Vox http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malfoymadness "I know the true world, and you know I do. But we needn't let it think we all bow down." --Christopher Fry _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
