On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Azalais Aranxta wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Andrew Ducker wrote: > >> Azalais Aranxta wrote: >>> There really is a point at which there should be a force-cut, >> >> I agree - _if_ the reader has specifically chosen to tick that >> button. > > I'm not opposed to there being a button. If there is really > somebody out there who is willing to read 40 pages of anything on > their reading page without a cut because the integrity of the > OP's intentions is that important to them, and that's you, my > hat's off to you :) > > But I do think it's an accessibility issue for a lot of folks > when you get to the really loooooooooooooooong posts.
Accessibility, and iPhone friendliness. Scrolling's fast and easy on a computer with a scrollbar, not so much when you're doing it via gestures on an itty bitty screen. I'd love a collapse button so that I could hide what I've read already and speed up access to the new stuff. > I do think that since it's possible to post > 20+ pages of material, there maybe should at least be a ticky box > that says "auto-cut anything over such and such length." > > Because a lot of people would be happier. *shrug* That would be *really* nice on comms, where it might be in the rules to cut long posts but who ever reads the rules? And an automatic "all pics go behind cut" would help with the occasional trollpost of offensive pictures that comms get on occasion. _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
