On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Fox wrote: > Azalais wrote: > > > But if I thought it was just *my* problem I'd never have > > said this much about it. I see a lot of pointless arguments on > > LJ about whether or not something ought to be cut and if I never > > ever had to read lj-cut wank, I'd be super happy. > > A ticky box for posters that says "go ahead and cut everything > over [x]" isn't a bad idea, but it's not likely the > THISISIMPORTANT posters you've alluded to would ever tick it. > Such a ticky box for readers, well, that's a version of what > we've been talking about here, of course. :-)
Yes. I was thinking of a ticky box for readers. The readers are the ones who start LJ-cut wank, even though they are usually *not* the most obnoxious parties in it. (Srsly, I am amazed at the amount of vitriol a polite request for a cut can arouse in some communities, particularly from those who feel they are defending the rights of employers and don't seem to be aware that all employees have mandated break time but the fact that you are on break doesn't make it ok to have nudie shots on your screen in the office.) Azalais :) **************************************************************** Azalais Aranxta (~malfoy) ataniell93 on LiveJournal and Vox http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malfoymadness "I know the true world, and you know I do. But we needn't let it think we all bow down." --Christopher Fry _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
