Fair enough. My last reply went out seconds before I saw this. Sorry. Ruth
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Rachel Walmsley <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we please call a hiatus on this discussion for now? I think that > most thigns that can be said about this have been said by this point, > and it mostly seems to be the same points being reiterated. I don't want > anyone to feel like I'm trying to censor them, because I'm not! I'm just > worried that with all the volume that we have had and are continuing to > have on this issue, we're drowning out any other possible discussions on > this list, and possibly also driving away people who just don't want to > deal with this volume of email. So what I'm asking for (and it is just > asking) is that we all just take a break from discussing this at least > until Mark or Denise have had a chance to read over this thread and > state some sort of an official position. Once they say what general > approach they're planning to take, then we can concentrate on any > minutiae of exactly how it should be implemented. > > -- > rho > _______________________________________________ > dw-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss > -- The worst sin -- perhaps the only sin -- passion can commit, is to be joyless. - Dorothy L. Sayers http://telereads.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
