The DXCC listings in the yearly book and Honor Roll should be in order
of "current" entities with a slash to show totals with those deleted.
So if W1AW has worked them all plus 20 deleted, the call would appear
under 335 as W1AW/355. You could then quickly see how you stack up
against the competition. And if you are interested in the absolute
number, it's there. The "current" total is the only meaningful
competitive measure. Listing calls with high totals that are also not
on the honor roll because they haven't been active in years is a silly
curiosity. The notion of "working them all" went out the window when
the first deleted entity was "created." Absolute totals are a testimony
to age and not current competitive activity.
One long time DXer's opinion.
73, Steve WB6RSE
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
- [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Steve Lawrence
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings N4KG
- [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings John and Mari Minke
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Paul Playford
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings John and Mari Minke
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Ron Notarius WN3VAW
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Jose E. Ribeiro Sa
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Ron Notarius WN3VAW
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Steve Lawrence
- [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings K0LUZ
- Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Listings Steve Lawrence