>> I believe what you're saying is wrong in many ways, RJ!! > >I don't see how JP. This is a problem for quite a few webmasters. > >> (i) the e-gold SCI is completely secure if you use it properly. Just >> use the status.cgi, check the hash properly, and record all >> transaction ids to ensure no-one is multi-posting a payment. > >Right, however, there is no easy explanation of this task for the >inexperienced. Seeing as you have it worked out, why don't you write the >docs for people to more easily understand this method.
no way man! ISL charges like 20 grand to set up a proper e-gold merchant system! "open source" is for poor people :) >I don't know if I would actually put it "that way". I, personally, would use >"inexperienced" instead of incompetent and I definitely would NOT use the >term "dopers" when referring to anyone that doesn't know what I know but >could and would benefit from the proper explanation and/or assistance. > Still, I understand what you mean: it's a problem, the problem being that many people can't do it. But you started off by saying e-gold's interface is not secure. Au contraire, it's very secure!! It's perfect. I'd discuss it more, but I can't quote any more of yuour post. Good luck! --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.e-gold.com/stats.html lets you observe the e-gold system's activity now!
