Do you know any suitable solution for the dependency issue?
If not, what is the advantage of having the wizard in PDE while the tools
are not?
And again: If we move the tools to PDE, we cut off all existing committers,
even if many of them are not active.

Best Regards

Jonas

Am 01.08.2014 10:26, schrieb Lars Vogel:

+ I plan to integrate the e4 wizard into the PDE wizard.

Awesome if you could bring the model editor also to PDE.
Am 31.07.2014 18:24 schrieb "Jonas Helming" <jonas.helm...@googlemail.com>:

>  Hi,
>
> the last issue (emf.edit dependency) seems to be hard to resolve. I
> therefore suggest the following as a pragmatic solution:
>
> 1. We do the checkpoint build now, which is compatible with Luna. As there
> were no blocking issues, are we ready to go? @Paul: Could you trigger this?
> 2. We configure a tycho build producing an update site for the core e4
> tools only (I would do this)
> 3. We get the e4 tools (only the editor) on board of Mars (I would take
> care of this)
>
> Are there any objections, opinions?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Jonas
>
>
> Am 30.07.2014 14:25, schrieb Lars Vogel:
>
> > @Lars: In general I would love, if the tools are moved to PDE and
> thereby become part of Mars. If you need any help, please let me know.
>
>  Any work here is welcome. For example you or someone else could work on
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=428375 to integrate the
> model editor into PDE.
>
>  IMHO the real issue is that most of our committers are inactive, see
> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/eclipse.e4/who
>
>  Best regards, Lars
>
>
>
>
> 2014-07-30 14:18 GMT+02:00 Jonas Helming <jonas.helm...@googlemail.com>:
>
>>  AFAIK, it is not possible to produce releases from an incubation
>> project. SWTBot is according to the website and the projects list a mature
>> project.
>>
>> As stated before, I would be able to spend effort on this item.
>> @Lars: In general I would love, if the tools are moved to PDE and thereby
>> become part of Mars. If you need any help, please let me know.
>> However, when we dicussed this possibility over one year ago, there was
>> the concern, that it is not so easy anymore for the existing e4 committers
>> to work on the tools unless they all become committer, which in turn the
>> PDE team might not like.
>>
>>
>> Am 30.07.2014 13:57, schrieb Sopot Çela:
>>
>>  I'm not sure what all the projects in Eclipse do but
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase
>> clearly states you're not supposed to have N.x release where N>0 while
>> you're in incubation. CC'ed Wayne for comments.
>>
>>  Sopot
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Olivier Prouvost <
>> olivier.prouv...@opcoach.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>>  Being an incubation project does not really exclude to produce a 1.0
>>> release…  SWTBot is a 2.2.1 and is developed as an incubation project…  So
>>> having a e4 tools 1.0 is possible...
>>>
>>>  I think that creating a new project will not really change the
>>> result.. But changing the way to work on it probably…
>>>
>>>  As Lars said, we work on this project on our spare time. This is the
>>> life of this kind of project. No problem about that for me. We try to do
>>> our best to achieve a good product. But even if we do our best, a direction
>>> must be defined more clearly. Today bugs are opened more for personal
>>> reasons (i would like to see this like this) or for urgency,  rather than
>>> for global or strategical reasons. May be some bugs could be identified as
>>> ‘strategic' and they would open a discussion about it… We could may be
>>> schedule 2 or 3 strategic bugs per release ? And in our bugzilla queries we
>>> could have them as a common goal besides our personal bugs.
>>>
>>>  Something that could be more efficient also, would be to schedule a
>>> real physical meeting during each eclipse con since we are almost all
>>> attending. We could prepare a set of issues to be discussed… Today this
>>> kind of meeting is hold by BOF where the subjects are not really defined
>>> and the BOF itself is organized if we want/think to organize it (during
>>> last Econ US I asked for one but it was not really scheduled).
>>>
>>>  As Jonas said, the discussion about the dialogs in model has been done
>>> a year ago, but it must continue to know what we can do with it… The new
>>> discussion could be in one of the issues of this meeting after speaking
>>> about it on mailing list...
>>>
>>>  And to finish, integrating E4 stuff in the mars PDE would be probably
>>> a good idea
>>>
>>>  Regards
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Le 30 juil. 2014 à 13:11, Lars Vogel <lars.vo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>  About a new e4 tools project? I think that is not necessary, we could
>>> graduate e4 tools also from the existing project. The issue IMHO is that
>>> that we need a new project but that no one does real work on this item at
>>> the moment.
>>>
>>>  FYI - I plan to integrate the e4 project wizard for Mars into PDE.
>>>
>>>  Best regards, Lars
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-07-30 11:08 GMT+02:00 Jonas Helming <jonas.helm...@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>>>  Any comments on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 25.07.2014 14 <25.07.2014%2014>:04, schrieb Jonas Helming:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The second issue has been discussed a year ago with no result. But I
>>>> agree that having the tools in an incubation state and additionally not in
>>>> the release train is bad for the adoption. As the e4 project is an
>>>> incubation project, it cannot produce 1.0 releases. The options were to
>>>> move them to PDE or the platform, but there was never a conclusion to this.
>>>> I would like to suggest a third solution: create a new e4 tools
>>>> project. This would enable us to graduate the e4 tools easily, keep all
>>>> existing (and interested) comitters and join the release train.
>>>> I would be willing to drive this, if everybody agrees.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> Jonas
>>>>
>>>> Am 25.07.2014 13 <25.07.2014%2013>:14, schrieb Olivier Prouvost:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>>  I am on holidays and cannot test the new release...
>>>>
>>>>  Some remarks anyway :
>>>>
>>>>  As tom said, I think the dialogs/windows node is really confusing and
>>>> dialogs are not usable as it is today. It would be really interesting to
>>>> start a new discussion on this topic as soon as possible to find together
>>>> an operational and efficient solution. It should probably not appear as it
>>>> is now in the stable version..
>>>>
>>>>  Another remark concerns the release number .. Are the e4 platform and
>>>> tools always considered as incubation projects ? In this case industry will
>>>> not adopt it easily.. It is really the moment to have a 1.0 e4 tools
>>>> version. I know it is psychological but it is important.
>>>>
>>>>  For input parts I don ´t remeber the discussion which led to their
>>>> deprecation. But AFAIK it would be possible to find them by annotation
>>>> analysis (input part is a part having a method @Persist) ? This could be a
>>>> new api on partservice to get them ?
>>>>
>>>>  Regards
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 25 juil. 2014 à 12:58, Sopot Çela <sopotc...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>   I did some testing and I think we can 'release' this. We can address
>>>> Tom's concerns along the way. I tested also the live editor and did not
>>>> notice any freezing.
>>>>
>>>> Sopot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Tom Schindl <
>>>> tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The editor currently allows to add dialogs & wizards who are
>>>>> provisional
>>>>> APIs, shouldn't the tooling show this to the user?
>>>>>
>>>>> Same goes for InputPart which is marked as deprecated - although I
>>>>> voted
>>>>> against that deprecation - and should be shown like this!
>>>>>
>>>>> I also just fixed a minor problem with CompositePart part which now
>>>>> allows you to set the title, icon, ... .
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23.07.14 18:00, Lars Vogel wrote:
>>>>> > It is not yet solved, but Steven found a workaround. I recently
>>>>> noticed
>>>>> > that keybinding for cut and paste are also not working. I think we
>>>>> need
>>>>> > to fix that least the keybinding thing. I plan to look at that next
>>>>> week
>>>>> > (if no one else fixes it before that).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best regards, Lars
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2014-07-22 15:59 GMT+02:00 Paul Webster <
>>>>> pwebs...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca
>>>>>  > <mailto:pwebs...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca>>:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Lars Vogel <
>>>>> lars.vo...@gmail.com
>>>>>  >     <mailto:lars.vo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         I gave the e4 tools a quick test and if I open the "Live
>>>>> model
>>>>> >         editor" the IDE freezes (reacts very slowly). Can someone
>>>>> retest?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         Bug report:
>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=439511
>>>>> >         I think we should wait with publishing the tools to the
>>>>> market
>>>>> >         place until this is fixed.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     What's the status of this?  It's holding up our 0.16 stable
>>>>> checkpoint.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     Later,
>>>>> >     Paul
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     --
>>>>> >     Paul Webster
>>>>> >     Hi floor.  Make me a sammich! - GIR
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>>>> >     e4-dev mailing list
>>>>>  >     e4-dev@eclipse.org <mailto:e4-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>>  >     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>>>> >     unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> >     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > e4-dev mailing list
>>>>> > e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> e4-dev mailing list
>>>>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>> e4-dev mailing list
>>>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>>> from this list, visit
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> e4-dev mailing liste4-...@eclipse.org
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
>>>> from this list, visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> e4-dev mailing list
>>>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>>> from this list, visit
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>> e4-dev mailing list
>>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>> from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> e4-dev mailing list
>>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>> from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> e4-dev mailing liste4-...@eclipse.org
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
>> this list, visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> e4-dev mailing list
>> e4-dev@eclipse.org
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing liste4-...@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> e4-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>


_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing liste4-...@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list,
visithttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Reply via email to