In a message dated 98-09-06 17:26:09 EDT, you write:
<< And if you arent spiritual?
Just Curious,
Bertina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
Hi!
I am going to sound really naive here - but given my limited knowledge of
other religious and non-religious beliefs - are there actually people in this
world who believe in no spirits at all?
Peace,
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 7 06:50:59 1998
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 08:50:30 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why men batter women
In a message dated 98-09-07 05:07:08 EDT, you write:
<< secular humanist, a neopagan and an
> ecofeminist >>
Hi!
Can somebody please explain neopagan and secular humanist?
Thanks!
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 7 06:55:48 1998
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 08:55:40 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why men batter women
In a message dated 98-09-07 05:07:08 EDT, you write:
<<
I would think so. Though supporting the bombing of innocent civilians
would I suspect disqualify you from calling yourself an ecofeminist.
>>
Hi!
It was clear that the people who somewhat supported the bombing were in
agreement that it was saving thousands of other lives - it was a stop them
before they kill more attempt/ Although, it was not clear if other peaceful
alternatives were pursued before the bombing. It might have been a hasty
diseaster or a clear message.
What was great was that a discussion about the kind of men behind this kind
of terror are exposed - what do they believe spiritually? how do they treat
their own women? are they more men pulling more power plays at the expense of
the Earth and innocent people? I do not believe that merely defending the
actions excludes you from believing that there is a connection between the
domination of the Earth and the domination of women -Richard, isn't THAT what
Ecofeminism is about?
Thanks and love!
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 7 08:57:07 1998
From: "Joe E. Dees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 09:57:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Why men batter women
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 10:00:26 +0100
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Richard Twine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why men batter women
>
>
> Joe E. Dees wrote:
>
> > It is possible to be a secular humanist, a neopagan and an
> > ecofeminist all at once. I am such a person.
>
> I would think so. Though supporting the bombing of innocent civilians
> would I suspect disqualify you from calling yourself an ecofeminist.
Still defending and supporting that misogynist fundamentalist
terrorist zealot fanatic, and on an antimisogynist listserv, yet, eh,
Dick? Defend him to the family members of the women, men and
children who died in Tanzania, Kenya, Egypt and New York!
Osama Bin Ladin is many things, but "innocent" is not one of them.
