>
>As far as the dictionary definition of 'pagan' goes, I think a lot of
>pagans would scoff at the dictionary itself. It can also be an oppressive
>patriarchal tool...
Yes! The dickshunary is industrialization of the language when it had been
much more organic before. Froze the language in a lot of ways and, to add
injury to insult, it was frozen at totally arbritrary place as far as
fonetics. Now its the authority, even if it says buddhists are pagans (
which neither group would agree with).
>> The Earth was never intended to be dominated by over-
>> zealous, disrespectful, power hungry, greedy men or women!
>
>Okay. Here's where we get to the crux of the matter. Angela, who is
>doing the "intending" here?
the crux of the matter
is in tending
who is doing this
in tending Here?.........
dippedifiknow. But i really like the question.
I think we can all agree with angela's statement, even people who think
that nobody intended anything can agree that Earth was meant to be
disrespected.
here is a short poem on the subject of speling:
A simpel spell
Teach funetics,
and let the people spel
as they wil.
wil baysun
