Here's a great example of tradeoffs. I have a million food allergies and
have just embarked on a massive, complex and probably VERY rewarding
campaign to neutralize (or at least learn to live with) them.
One of the most emphatic recommendations in my "how to" book for
environmentally sensitive individuals is that EVERy food which is not known
to be organic should be soaked in Chlorox for at least 20 minutes before
cooking.
Anyone out there have a less environmentally destructive way to detoxify
fish, fruit, veggies and poultry? (I know, I should just skip the
poultry and fish, but I'm massively allergic to beans, nuts and dairy, so
...)
I would really be grateful for any suggestions ...
Faith
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 22 12:05:49 MDT 1995
MR-Received: by mta WPB1; Relayed; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 14:05:36 -0500
MR-Received: by mta EPIC66; Relayed; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 14:05:38 -0500
Alternate-recipient: prohibited
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 13:55:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Carol Meeds WPB 407-433-2650 x 113 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FWD: RACHEL #348: Warning on Male Reproductive Health
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ecofem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Posting-date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 14:05:00 -0500 (EST)
Importance: normal
UA-content-id: A77ZVSOK4MAF
A1-type: MAIL
Hop-count: 2
Hi Jayne:
I am putting my answer to you on the ecofem "all" distribution
because I feel if I failed to make myself clear to you (AND I hold
the belief that you are a intelligent, informed caring person),
then I should clarify to the list.
My "joke" was a lighthearted response to the posting of the Wood
person. I "tried to imagine" a role reversal, a situation where
women could "flame bait" men on a primarily male forum. Having
just read the _Rachael_ on the "Warning on Male Reproductive
Health" and knowing that this forum was ECOFEM, where I might
expect to find others who subscribed to _Rachael_, I spoke in
short hand and just referenced one aspect of this newsletter and
how it could be used as "flame-baiT". I am glad to introduce
several people who would not have know about _Rachael_ to it.
Welcome. Enjoy. Check out the references!
I don't see an article that focuses on the "male reproductive"
system as being biased. What I have observed after posting
articles like this is that they do generate a bit of excitment. I
have been circulating various Rachael's and other "liberal" and
environmental electronic postings and this above all else has made
the recipients verbal off-line!
