Hi again.

I'd like to thank everyone who responded and shared opinions.

Our transactions are fairly simple comparing to retail (in or out). I am 
confident that most of the partner maps could be converted into a merged 
template where any custom parameters are driven by external codelists (tables). 
Besides, if I put in time and effort into conversion now, it would save me a 
bundle when I need to remap all of our transactions o SAP interface.

I've already mapped few newer partners using this concept as a POC, in both 
unbound and outbound direction, and they've worked so good - I've moved the 
maps into production. The immediate result is obvious - I no longer have to 
submit Map Change request for maps to Change Committee, since most of my 
changes for these partners are "data changes, not a code changes" (wink-wink).

Again, thanks for a wonderful feedback. I specially like the statement that 
single map concept becomes a trend for a service hubs. That's a solid argument 
right there.

Thanks, and have a great weekend, with fries or without. 
I myself just had a chili fries from Wendy's and it was delish!

Take care,

Ilia.


--- In [email protected], "shluft"  wrote:
>
> Hi.
> 
> In preparation to our SAP migration I've offered my boss to migrate our 
> numerous customized and mostly simple per-partner maps into centralized map 
> driven by partner-based parameters configured within the EDI system (Sterling 
> Integrator).
> 
> My boss was challenging me whether this was within "Best practices of EDI". I 
> understand this is rather conceptual issue, and question is whether it would 
> be hard to maintain centralized map (whenever there is a need to change 
> something for 1 partner, you'd have to retest the data for all of them, I get 
> that :)))
> 
> Never the less, if EDI is not ran by consulting shop, and the long term goal 
> is reducing maintenance and cost - would this approach fall within "Best 
> practices of EDI" and would there be any documentation out there to support 
> it, other then exchange of opinions of EDI gurus on this mailing list?
> 
> Yeah, and I wana fries with that!
> 
> Happy Friday!
> 
> :))))
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ilia.
>




------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to