On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 15:12 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote:
> 
> I don't think Andrew was suggesting that we commit a change that would
> break CLANG builds.

Upon further investigation, I think CLANG builds are broken anyway.

Even when compiling in 32-bit mode, emitting instructions with 16-bit
addresses, LLVM breaks. It recognises the fact that it needs a 0x67
address size prefix, but then fails to encode the instruction properly.

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18220

So just putting an #ifdef __clang__ around the .code16 directive,
leaving the code utterly non-functional, would probably not cause a
regression :)

-- 
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to