On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 15:12 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote: > > I don't think Andrew was suggesting that we commit a change that would > break CLANG builds.
Upon further investigation, I think CLANG builds are broken anyway. Even when compiling in 32-bit mode, emitting instructions with 16-bit addresses, LLVM breaks. It recognises the fact that it needs a 0x67 address size prefix, but then fails to encode the instruction properly. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18220 So just putting an #ifdef __clang__ around the .code16 directive, leaving the code utterly non-functional, would probably not cause a regression :) -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel