On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:16 -0800, Andrew Fish wrote: > Thanks, I see the internal bug report that we filed has already been > updated with info about your patches. So thanks!
Nice. I'm glad someone with an actual clue is looking at it. I know my patches are going to need a little bit of work, but they should at least be relatively close. Close enough to annoy someone into doing it properly, at least :) > > The existing .code32-translated abomination in Thunk16.S probably > > *still* won't work, since it makes hard-coded assumptions about what > > size of displacement the assembler will use. It "knows" that the > > assembler will use [REG]+disp16 in some places where LLVM will actually > > use [REG]+disp32, and thus the hard-coded offsets are going to break. > > > > With out doing my research (like I should) is this instruction a > pseudo-op that the assembler gets to chose? So there is no syntax to > say use displacement size X or Y? No, I don't believe so. Although there's always .byte :) -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
