I believe, the thrust of the "fries" reply was the overcount in the
5*4*3*..... response rather than an expression of culinary preferences.
----- Original Message -----
From: J. Williams <mackeral@remove~this~first~yahoo.com>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Help me an idiot
> On 29 Apr 2001 04:09:05 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Bohlman) wrote:
>
>
> >"I wanted that with *fries* and *ketchup*! *Not* ketchup and fries!"
>
> We hear you, but fries were not included in the original
> problem...only the 5 condiments. But you're right, fries would be
> good with that! Order me one. You could make this a really nice
> little problem by adding in fries to the no. of possible combinations.
> Put onion rings in the option list too. With or without a shake would
> be a nice touch too. But, hey, why confuse this kid any more than
> necessary? He's got homework to do! :-)))
>
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
