(Warren) wrote in message:
> So, what is your best way to explain a CI? How do you explain it
> without using some esoteric discussion of probability?
I prefer to focus on the reliability of the estimate and say it is:
"A range of values for an estimate that reflect its unreliability and
which contain the parameter of interest 95% of the time in the long run."
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================
