For the sake of those interested more in "stat" than "ed" -- is there a more
apt list that someone might recommend? I also prefer emails to newsgroups,
but that is certainly a lot of mail to filter through!

thanks,
p

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Bokhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [edstat] Future of EdStat list


> This e-mail list is one of the few I subscribe to, since
> the early 1990's and it has clearly changed, with less of
> the "Ed", and ever more of the "Stat".  However, the quality
> of postings has remained high, and this is obviously due in
> part to the hard work of the moderator and the vigorous watch
> over spam.  Without a moderator/listowner this would not be
> possible, and we would be left with no choice but to discontinue.
> However, in expressing my thanks to the present list owner for
> the work of maintaining it, I also hope that it can be continued,
> and that someone will come forward to take on the thankless task.
>
> A good e-mail subscription is a rare delight, especially when it
> comes to you packaged in digest format.  Personally, I never
> venture into the newgroups anymore although I have done so in
> the past a great deal - that is the jungle, a wild free-for-all
> compared to the trickle of distilled information you get by
> subscription!
>
> Frank Bokhorst
> Psychology Dept
> University of Cape Town
>
> .
> .
> =================================================================
> Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
> problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
> .                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
> =================================================================
>

.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to