On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:20 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:17 +0200, Jane Weideman wrote:
> > The reasoning was to create the devel channels first, and if when the
> > traffic grew to big to manage we would spilt the user support and
> > discussion off.
> 
> I remember that, yes. What I discussed with Oli, is that less people are
> subscribing, because they see the list as a -devel list such as
> ubuntu-devel and debian-devel, and not a support list. I've communicated
> with many people who haven't joined the list yet, because of this
> perception.

Hmm, ok you may have a point, and I'd hate for us to be scaring people
off.

> > Has this time arrived yet? I am not sure, as Oliver still answers the
> > bulk of the questions.
> 
> I don't think so. I suggested to Oli that we get an additional
> 'edubuntu' list. He suggested that we rename the current one instead,
> which would make sense, since he'd be on the 'normal' list anyway :)

What would the impact be? would the change be transparent to those that
have already subscribed?

I am happy to do it if it is a non-disruptive change.

regards,
-- 
JaneW
_____________
Jane Weideman
mobile: +27 83 779 7800
Canonical Ltd.



-- 
edubuntu-devel mailing list
edubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel

Reply via email to