Tyler-

Thanks. I hope it's 100% clear to everyone with that concern now.

Regards,
Glen

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 3:06:23 PM UTC-4, ty...@elastic.co wrote:
>
> Glen,
>
> We'll be setting up a dedicated instance of Discourse with the 
> functionality in question, which is still forthcoming. Once we have that, 
> we'll be able to provide the information necessary to subscribe to what 
> you're interested in and reply via email.
>
> We've been beating on Discourse for a while now to ensure everything works 
> as promised, and I can confirm that the features you're testing work - we 
> just haven't deployed the platform yet. We're approaching this skeptically 
> to ensure the features we want do what we expect. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Tyler
>
> On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 12:31:19 PM UTC-6, Glen Smith wrote:
>>
>> My experiment so far: 
>> Action: enabled email notification for all new posts
>> Outcome: Received a notification
>>
>> Action: post by replying to a notification email:
>> Outcome:
>>
>>
>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fHmgizKoI-Y/VS6uXmOD5tI/AAAAAAAAA8E/7aCXAfS0HsQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-04-15%2Bat%2B2.27.14%2BPM.png>
>> Guidance?
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 1:21:07 PM UTC-4, leslie.hawthorn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I should clarify that I have no issues moving to Discourse, as long as 
>>>> instantaneous email interaction is preserved, just wanted to point out 
>>>> that 
>>>> I see no issues with the mailing lists.
>>>>
>>> Understood. 
>>>
>>>> The question is moot anyways since the change will happen regardless of 
>>>> our inputs.
>>>>
>>> Actually, I'm maintaining our Forums pre-launch checklist where there's 
>>> a line item for "don't move forward based on community feedback". I 
>>> respectfully disagree with your assessment that the change will happen 
>>> regardless of input from the community. We asked for feedback for a reason. 
>>> :)
>>>
>>>> I hope we can subscribe to Discourse mailing lists without needing an 
>>>> account.
>>>>
>>> You'll need an account, but it's a one-time login to set up your 
>>> preferences and then read/interact solely via email.  
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> LH
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ivan
>>>> On Apr 13, 2015 7:13 PM, "Leslie Hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your feedback, Ivan.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's no plan to remove threads from the forums, so information 
>>>>> would always be archived there as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that impact your thoughts on moving to Discourse?
>>>>>
>>>>> Folks, please keep the feedback coming!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> LH
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Ivan Brusic <iv...@brusic.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As one of the oldest and most frequent users (before my sabbatical) 
>>>>>> of the mailing list, I just wanted to say that I never had an issue with 
>>>>>> it. It works. As long as I could continue using only email, I am happy. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For realtime communication, there is the IRC channel. If prefer the 
>>>>>> mailing list since everything is archived. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ivan 
>>>>>>  On Apr 2, 2015 5:36 PM, "leslie.hawthorn" <leslie....@elastic.co> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As we’ve begun to scale up development on three different open 
>>>>>>> source projects, we’ve found Google Groups to be a difficult solution 
>>>>>>> for 
>>>>>>> dealing with all of our needs for community support. We’ve got multiple 
>>>>>>> mailing lists going, which can be confusing for new folks trying to 
>>>>>>> figure 
>>>>>>> out where to go to ask a question. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’ve also found our lists are becoming noisy in the “good problem 
>>>>>>> to have” kind of way. As we’ve seen more user adoption, and across such 
>>>>>>> a 
>>>>>>> wide variety of use cases, we’re getting widely different types of 
>>>>>>> questions asked. For example, I can imagine that folks not using our 
>>>>>>> Python 
>>>>>>> client would rather not be distracted with emails about it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There’s also a few other strikes against Groups as a tool, such as 
>>>>>>> the fact that it is no longer a supported product by Google, it 
>>>>>>> provides no 
>>>>>>> API hooks and it is not available for users in China.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’ve evaluated several options and we’re currently considering 
>>>>>>> shuttering the elasticsearch-user and logstash-users Google Groups in 
>>>>>>> favor 
>>>>>>> of a Discourse forum. You can read more about Discourse at 
>>>>>>> http://www.discourse.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We feel Discourse will allow us to provide a better experience for 
>>>>>>> all of our users for a few reasons:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * More fine grained conversation topics = less noise and better 
>>>>>>> targeted discussions. e.g. we can offer a forum for each language 
>>>>>>> client, 
>>>>>>> individual logstash plugin or for each city to plan user group 
>>>>>>> meetings, 
>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Facilitates discussions that are not generally happening on list 
>>>>>>> now, such as best practices by use case or tips from moving to 
>>>>>>> development 
>>>>>>> to production
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Easier for folks who are purely end users - and less used to 
>>>>>>> getting peer support on a mailing list - to get help when they need it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obviously, Discourse does not function the exact same way as a 
>>>>>>> mailing list - however, email interaction with Discourse is supported 
>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>> will continue to allow you to participate in discussions over email 
>>>>>>> (though 
>>>>>>> there are some small issues related to in-line replies. [0])
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’re working with the Discourse team now as part of evaluating this 
>>>>>>> transition, and we know they’re working to resolve this particular 
>>>>>>> issue. 
>>>>>>> We’re also still determining how Discourse will handle our needs for 
>>>>>>> both 
>>>>>>> user and list archive migration, and we’ll know the precise details of 
>>>>>>> how 
>>>>>>> that would work soon. (We’ll share when we have them.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The final goal would be to move Google Groups to read-only archives, 
>>>>>>> and cut over to Discourse completely for community support discussions. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’re looking at making the cut over in ~30 days from today, but 
>>>>>>> obviously that’s subject to the feedback we receive from all of you. 
>>>>>>> We’re 
>>>>>>> sharing this information to set expectations about time frame for 
>>>>>>> making 
>>>>>>> the switch. It’s not set in stone. Our highest priority is to ensure 
>>>>>>> effective migration of our list archives and subscribers, which may 
>>>>>>> mean a 
>>>>>>> longer time horizon for deploying Discourse, as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the meantime, though, we wanted to communicate early and often 
>>>>>>> and get your feedback. Would this change make your life better? Worse? 
>>>>>>> Meh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts with us so we can evaluate your feedback. 
>>>>>>> We don’t take this switch lightly, and we want to understand how it 
>>>>>>> will 
>>>>>>> impact your overall workflow and experience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We’ll make regular updates to the list responding to incoming 
>>>>>>> feedback and be completely transparent about how our thought processes 
>>>>>>> evolve based on it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [0] - 
>>>>>>> https://meta.discourse.org/t/migrating-from-google-groups/24695
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> LH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leslie Hawthorn
>>>>>>> Director of Developer Relations
>>>>>>> http://elastic.co
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CAHj2c4A6M4LfRUaEeTQbFx16%3D%2Bi5cvuzunB0f3rbQaeP312COQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "elasticsearch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to elasticsearc...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQD0j7gqvO1yZQ48mOyCef1ijoRBqgTN%3D_chcYn_AYy00A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Leslie Hawthorn
>>> Director of Developer Relations
>>> http://elastic.co
>>>
>>> Other Places to Find Me:
>>> Freenode: lh
>>> Twitter: @lhawthorn
>>> Skype: mebelh
>>> Voice: +31 20 794 7300
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elasticsearch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/a769cf7a-6e57-463e-92be-02aaf673a663%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to