*Kevin,*
*
*
*That seems to me, on the surface at least, a great idea.*
*
*
*I hope someone more learned than I takes it on.*
*
*
*Grin*
*
*
*73's*
*Gary
*
On 28 March 2011 07:38, Gary Gregory <garyvk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> *Edward,*
> *
> *
> *Now that the contest is over the bands should return to normalcy and by
> this I mean clean clear signals will again be heard.*
> *
> *
> *I wonder how many contesters were using SDR radios?....*
> *
> *
> *Listening to absolutely horrible audio and distorted CQ calls then a
> voice change when you work the station and find that the PTT audio is almost
> as bad. In some cases all but impossible to understand what the operator was
> saying.*
> *
> *
> *Yes the points are all that are important but when did that have to be
> the overriding factor above a clean signal?*
> *
> *
> *Certainly some stations were using software such as N1MM and wave files
> for their CQ Contest calls but surely they could take the time to ensure
> that their audio cables were not affected by RF, mic gain/ comp settings
> were correct for clear audio and the list goes on I am sure.*
> *
> *
> *One station here in VK was so bad I heard him call for 5 minutes without
> a response and when I suggested he had an issue he simply  ignored my
> comment and started to CQ again.*
> *
> *
> *The stations in the contest in VK that I know use the K3 were all
> sounding great.*
> *
> *
> *Maybe SDR means true 'software controlled' with a box minus the knobs and
> buttons, but I think it would be a handful in a contest and I am not sure I
> want to place that much faith in a radio dependant entirely on Microsoft
> etc. A full Linux/Apple OS may be more reliable?*
> *
> *
> *The K3 to my mind IS SDR with a fully operational radio for those of us
> who dislike the mouse and function key style of operating becoming more
> popular and you have the option to add programs such as LP-PAN etc.*
> *
> *
> *The simple connections to a PC from the K3 are ideal for the way I
> operate but these days I have settled on N1MM logging and the K3 for
> everything else.*
> *
> *
> *I wonder if I am headed for the minority benches?..Grin*
> *
> *
> *I hope all those who played in the contest had a great time, after all,
> it is just a hobby and a darn fine one at that and enjoyment should be what
> it's all about, whatever flips your switch!*
> *
> *
> *73's*
> *
> *
> *Gary
> *
>
> On 28 March 2011 04:39, Edward R. Cole <kl...@acsalaska.net> wrote:
>
>> I'll address this one more time and then let it rest.
>>
>> SDR = Software Defined Radio.  (i.e. the software defines it).  The
>> software is "in fact" the radio.
>>
>> It has been a long tradition of ham radio to being able to "build
>> it", yourself.  For SDR that includes the software.  If a commercial
>> SDR is not open-source it loses part of what being a SDR is all about for
>> hams.
>>
>> That being said, not many hams "build-it" anymore so, thankfully,
>> Elecraft has given considerable attention to the sw (firmware).  That
>> is lacking in a lot of other SDR ventures.  It also seems ham radio
>> is split into: "programing capable hams" and the rest of us.
>>
>> And one more footnote on my project.  I would have had to go with an
>> outside SDR to obtain wide-bandwidth, in any case.  the 15-KHz second
>> IF restricts what can be done with wide bw modes or displays.  Even
>> Elecraft recognizes this with using the 1st IF for the P3.
>>
>> I think that should finish this topic, OK?
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 12
>> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:51 -0400
>> From: Ed K1EP <k1ep.l...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums?
>> To: "Edward R. Cole" <kl...@acsalaska.net>,Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> Message-ID: <4d8f1b7a.49a2e60a.7126.0...@mx.google.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>
>> At 3/27/2011 04:22 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote:
>>  >Geoffrey,
>>  >
>>  >I am in the process of setting up my K3 with two LP-Pan feeding a
>>  >M-Audio Delta-44 dual-channel soundcard.  The reason for the LP-Pan
>>  >is to provide I-Q signals to a computer so that custom SDR sw may be
>>  >used (or developed).  The K3 has an internal MCU with Elecraft's
>>  >proprietary sw, but that is not open for sw developers to
>>  >access.  Therefore, the standard K3 falls short of its promise as a
>>  >SDR.
>>
>> I don't see anywhere in the definition of SDR that the software has
>> to open source.  If you wish to develop your own SDR software, the
>> LP-PAN is a perfect add on to allow you access to the IQ outputs for
>> developing your own software or modifying existing open source software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
>> ======================================
>> BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
>> EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
>> DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
>> ======================================
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
> Elecraft Equipment
> K3 #679, KPA-500 #018
> Living the dream!!!*
>
>


-- 

*VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
Elecraft Equipment
K3 #679, KPA-500 #018
Living the dream!!!*
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to