That's sounds very good But LOTW don't know about propagation and confirm any match, also when one side of the QSO was during his noon time
73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 25 jul. 2016, a las 18:56, Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com> escribió: > >> On Mon,7/25/2016 2:42 PM, Wes Stewart wrote: >> It's almost as bad in the states if you have 160-meter cards. For the life >> of me I can't understand why any card checker can't do 160 QSLs. > > The requirement is that a card checker must have achieved 160M DXCC > him/herself before they can check 160M cards. The reason is pretty simple -- > some operators were cheating by doctoring cards -- for example, by changing > 18.1 MHz to 1.8 MHz. The logic is that a card checker should know enough > about 160M propagation (and perhaps even activity) to know whether a QSL > might be invalid because it occurs at a time when the band could not possibly > have been open between the two stations (for example, no common darkness over > a realistic path, taking greyline into account). > > Sorry, but some folks aren't ethical. :) > > 73, Jim K9YC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to cx6vm.jo...@gmail.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
