When you try to compare two radios you get into a can of worms. I
own an FT-817 of about 5 years ago and it's a fine radio. It covers 6
meters and the two VHF-UHF bands that are not on a KX1.
But the KX1 uses less input power on receive and thus will last a
lot longer on the internal battery pack.
But the KX1 has no SSB and the FT-817 does.
You go around like this and miss the real good points of both radios
:-)
The KX1 is made to be carried in a pack to hard to walk to places. It
has a built in paddle and it works fine. I have taken my FT-817 on
similar trips and it does well too, but it needs more battery.
So both radios do the same thing but the FT-817 does a few more tricks.
73 Karl K5DI
Alexandra Carter wrote:
I am very happy to announce that I am apparently all wet!
From the sound of it, the KX1 I built a couple of years ago had some
undocumented "features" built in like perhaps the partial deafness
problem. Some serious testing on my part would have sniffed this out
and caused me to hunt down and solve the problem.
I am working on a K1 now, and when it's done I'll make sure it's
recieving the way it ought to.
73 de Alex NS6Y
On Jul 10, 2006, at 1:56 PM, ron wrote:
I always thought them KX1's were far superior to them 817's!
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
