John Magliacane wrote:
It's a traveling wave antenna where the helix is wound around a
supporting vertical mast that serves as a reflector.
None of the references I found (including university course notes), when
researching this at the weekend, described anything other than a
dielectric core. They did suggest a spectrum of behaviour from
basically linear polarized, to circular polarized, depending on the pitch.
Also, travelling wave antennas normally radiate almost parallel to the
length of antenna.
capacitively loaded, gamma matched dipoles. Some implementations of
these antennas place a number of identical dipole rings in parallel
with one another to reduce ohmic losses and improve efficiency.
I think I can produce a fairly good qualitative argument that that might
not work for radiating elements, even if there is an advantage for
lumped inductors.
If the individual wires strongly interact, which will be the limiting
case as you bring them close together, they will behave like the
individual elements of the cross section of a single conductor, and
therefor suffer a skin effect which will exclude current from the inner
ones and the insides of outer ones.
If they are positioned so that they don't interact with each other, each
will act as an independent radiator and have the radiation resistance it
would have had in isolation. It will also have the the same ohmic loss
resistance. So, although you reduce the ohmic resistance by paralleling
them, you also reduce the radiation resistance, in proportion.
For a non-qualitative proof, you would need to demonstrate that there
isn't some peak in performance, between these two extremes
These antennas may not be made from Litz wire, but the underlying
concept of distributing RF current among closely placed parallel
conductors in an effort reduce resistive losses is still the same.
Note that a fundamental part of the concept of Litz wire is that it is
intertwined, so that no one strand is always outside or always inside.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
