On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:32:06 -0700, wayne burdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Doug, > >There was plenty of logic behind it, but in hindsight it might not >sense for all users. (It did meet with the approval of our 20 field >testers.) > >The change was motivated by the sub receiver. Here's one example: > >Suppose you're using SPLIT, listening to a weak DX station on the main >RX (in a very narrow bandwidth with preamp on), while tuning for a >clear spot with the sub RX (using a wider bandwidth and preamp off). >With one tap of A>B you can move VFO B back to the starting point and >work your way up again. If this also copied VFO A's filter and preamp >settings (etc.) to VFO B, you'd have to set them up all over again. > >But I'll be happy to sit back and listen to arguments pro and con. If >it looks like a lot of operators would prefer to copy everything with >one tap, I could add a menu entry. If no one argues in favor of two-tap >(including the field testers), I could change it outright. I'm easy :) > >Thanks for your input. > >Wayne >N6KR > [snip] I vote for, the two step setting with a menu item for when one doesn't want it. Tom, N5GE _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
