Brian,

I agree with that.  The K3 does sound different than many other 
receivers, it is cleaner, and to my ears reproduces the signals that are 
actually present on the band more faithfully than many other receivers.  
Compare the K3 to a good Direct Conversion receiver or a KK7B Phasing 
receiver without a lot of audio filtering.
 
Yes, the K3 audio does have more high frequency content than required, 
so a low pass filter can strip that off for those who are bothered by 
the high frequency content.  That was what the filter on the DSP board 
is supposed to do.  But the downside is that those who want to hear HF 
broadcast signals in "Hi-Fi" want the audio spectrum to be opened up 
even broader than it is right now.  You just can't please everyone.

I would encourage those who think the K3 is more 'noisy' to listen to 
both the K3 and the comparison receiver with a 3 or 4 kHz audio low pass 
filter in line.  My ears act as low pass filters naturally and I do not 
perceive the K3 to be any noisier than other receivers.

73,
Don W3FPR 

Brian Machesney wrote:
> Gents,
>
> On the flip side, I - and, apparently, many other operators from whom
> we've heard on this and other reflectors - have run the K3 for 30+ hours out
> of a 48-hour contest and not experienced the fatigue you describe. Such
> fatigue would make any rig an intolerable chore to use and would detract
> substantially from the rave reviews the K3 has received in contesting
> circles.
>
> I agree with other post-ers to this reflector that I frequently find myself
> reaching to turn DOWN the RF gain control (I operate with
> factory-supplied AGC defaults). In this respect, I don't find anything WRONG
> with the K3, but I do find it to be DIFFERENT and I have had to modify my
> listening habits to accomodate that difference, just as I have had to do
> when changing radios in the past.
>
> We all appreciate that igs from different manufacturers have different
> "sounds;" I would describe the K3 as "less soft" than the TS850, "more
> precise" than the FT1KMP and "similar" to the Omni VII (I lack experience
> with Icom beyond using the 706MkIIG mobile). Now that I think of it, this
> appears to track the evolution of DSP from "none" to "very low IF" to
> "higher IF."
> 73 -- Brian -- K1LI
>   
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to