Kevin Venzke wrote: > > If people do altruistically truncate, it means that Condorcet is probably > less likely to elect a low-utility candidate than if otherwise. But I think > Bart's point is that voters shouldn't have to think about this.
Exactly or close enough. The fact that voters have a way to favor utility softens my concerns slighty about the "turkey" question, but the possibility of insincere truncation or even order-reversal raises other concerns. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
