On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Monkey Puzzle wrote:

Jobst, could you please clarify below?

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:56:06 -0800 (PST), Forest Simmons wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Jobst Heitzig wrote:
By the way, here's a simple "procedural" version of the method, to be
used in meetings:
      First, options may be suggested, and for every option it is asked who
approves of it. They are written onto blackboard in order of approval.
Then some member of the group is picked at random. S/he proposes some of
the options, and then this option is subjected to pairwise contests with
the more approved ones, beginning with the most approved one. If none of

The phrase "beginning with the most approved one" is the source of your confusion.


Actually the order doesn't matter here, except there should be some order.

The point is to find out if the candidate is beten by anybody with more approval.

If not, then this candidate is a member of P, and has been chosen by random voter.

Forest
----
Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to