That is a fair point, actually. I think the idea of aliasing the functions on 0.18 might be a good temporary measure which would allow the community to get used to the new function names without breaking any code and then the old ones can be removed in a later version.
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 2:56:16 PM UTC+1, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > I did a lot of work in ember myself, and I feel your pain, but this is > still a 0.x product, and so it should be expected that some breakage is > performed while we reach the best possible state of the language. It's > different for Ember, which had a lot of breakage post 1.0. > > tirsdag 25. oktober 2016 14.45.35 UTC+2 skrev James Hamilton følgende: >> >> I agree with your sentiment in principle. I suppose the underlying >>> question is whether or not this is actually going to be such a benefit to >>> future users of elm that it would be worth inconveniencing current users >>> who want to upgrade. Personally I'm quite comfortable with foldr and foldl >>> but I understand the foldLeft and foldRight are more expressive. >>> >> >> I used to use ember and its constant churn drove me to find an >> alternative which led me to elm. Not that the community elm behaves >> anything like ember in this regard, but still this blog post >> <https://medium.com/@frustrated_ember_developer/ember-js-another-year-of-churn-instability-and-festering-frustrations-4d01838361cb#.ha438hsub> >> rather >> sums up the danger of making a lot of inconvenient changes for apparently >> abstract reasons. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
