On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Max Goldstein <maxgoldste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It really comes down to what Evan wants to do. People come to Elm from > many languages, and everyone has preferences. Changing things makes > upgrading harder, invalidates old code, and gives the larger community the > impression that Elm is not stable. Old code is already invalid for other reasons and getting to a highly polished 1.0 justifies the trouble that we, the innovators have to go through. Also, changes like these are mechanical and some kind of tooling could make it very easy to upgrade a large codebase. *reduce* has a lot of notoriety built into it due to MapReduce. People frequently equate familiarity with good. :) -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
