On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 2:27:49 PM UTC+1, Wojtek Piekutowski wrote: > > The number of similar voices regarding community process and amount of > frequently requested missing features/native libraries (like binary support > and better JS interop) show a problem. No matter how amazing and performant > Elm will ever be, newcomers will be discouraged by everlasting begging for > native APIs support. > > Does anybody has an idea how other languages/platforms manage to get > community involved? I think it could be beneficial to learn from, for > example Elixir community, and borrow some good practices that could work > for Elm too. >
ZeroMQ was hugely successful. I worked on Apache Qpid AMQP in corporate sponsored context but sadly I only joined shortly after Hintjens left the project, in part due to a distasteful interaction with one of the other project sponsors that was very proprietary in its nature. This probably influenced his attitude to community in ZeroMQ. http://hintjens.com/blog:95 Worth a read and the other blog posts by him around the community process - I'm not saying this is perfect for Elm, just worth reading. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
