TRS-80 <lists.trs...@isnotmyreal.name> writes:
>> On 2020-12-02 16:59, Tim Cross wrote: >>> TRS-80 <lists.trs...@isnotmyreal.name> writes: >>> >> I note that in the email thread you referenced, the last post suggests >> setting up a custom readme format which would allow you to use HTML. >> Maybe that is the easiest route to take - org -> html with custom >> readme? > > Unfortunately, the Org HTML exporter (which is in fact the parent that > the Markdown exporter was derived from) also makes extensive use of the > id attribute and anchor links. So I am afraid those would be sanitized > out exactly the same. > OK. My reading of that response was that the custom approach would give you full control over the HTML. If they still run some sort of sanitiser, then you would still have an issue as you actually don't have full control. However, that does seem like an odd process. I mean, if you go to the trouble to setup a custom workflow and then having some arbitrary sanitiser come in at the end and move the goal posts seems broken to me. -- Tim Cross
