Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: >> I see. So not only inline tasks are ugly syntactic-wise, but they >> also have a specific behavior when exporting. All this pleas for an >> external module, not for something we support in Org's core IMHO. > > I do not think that it would be possible. In order to support > inlinetasks in agenda/sparse trees/todo setting/tag setting, we need to > modify the internals. I see no way around that.
Maybe we are miscommunicating: my suggestion is to _remove_ lisp/org-inlinetask.el from Org's core. > Too many aspects of Org are designed for one specific heading syntax. > Even modifying inlinetask *****... syntax will likely require adding > more special support where things "magically" work for now because > inlinetasks often look the same as headings. And that's part of the confusion: inline tasks _look like_ normal tasks while behaving differently. -- Bastien Guerry
