Russell Adams <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> writes: >> It will. And it will also break some of my workflows :( > > I think that's unfortunate, but perhaps it would improve the health of > the codebase?
Removing most features would improve health of the codebase. Like getting rid of agenda with its horrible code. But it does not mean that we should do it. >> > Could we normalize the code if some of the features were enabled in a >> > cookie/flag on a heading? >> >> We would need to put more special cases. Which has pros and cons, >> actually. The downside is more special cases. The upside is that most of >> inlinetask bugs are originating from the same code handling both >> inlinetasks and headings without accounting for their differences. > > It sounds like the code would be cleaner in a single place using a cookie. The cleanest would be something that does not match `org-outline-regexp-bol'. Then, we will avoid all the possible confusion between tasks and inlinetasks. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
