Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes: >> I do not think that it would be possible. In order to support >> inlinetasks in agenda/sparse trees/todo setting/tag setting, we need to >> modify the internals. I see no way around that. > > Maybe we are miscommunicating: my suggestion is to _remove_ > lisp/org-inlinetask.el from Org's core.
org-inlinetask.el cannot exist outside Org core without all the extra support for inlinetasks across Org codebase. So, what you are suggesting will completely remove inlinetasks feature. >> Too many aspects of Org are designed for one specific heading syntax. >> Even modifying inlinetask *****... syntax will likely require adding >> more special support where things "magically" work for now because >> inlinetasks often look the same as headings. > > And that's part of the confusion: inline tasks _look like_ normal > tasks while behaving differently. Yup. That's why I think that we need to make inlinetasks have distinct syntax. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
