Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com> writes: >> You can always ignore this warning. > > I presently update (via setq) org-lint--checker after filtering out this > checker. Is there a better way (i.e., one that doesn't rely on an > internal variable) for non-interactive use? Perhaps an > #'org-lint-remove-checker could be added to org-lint.el. For context, I > have code that non-interactively invokes org-lint and reports the > warnings. As such, ignoring by pressing "i" in the *Org Lint* buffer > isn't an option.
There is currently no such way. Although, it would be nice to have such a feature. Patches welcome! >> (If you have better ideas about how to approach the problem of >> misspelled language names, feel free to share them) > > I don't have a recommendation specific to the languages that only > support code execution, however, for languages in general wouldn't it be > better to consult something like the output of #'org-src-get-lang-mode > and see if that mode is either defined or can be loaded (depending on > whether or not we require the user to ensure whether the feature > representing the mode is already loaded or simply that it be possible to > be loaded)? Thanks! It is indeed a good idea. I added this check on bugfix. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=51aea4946 -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
