Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Indeed. But I wanted to nudge you to do a bit better :)
"Better" here is subjective and we have a difference in opinion, which is okay. While I am not motivated to submit such an alternative patch, I also am not aware of any common usecases that would become much more complicated as a result of it. > Further, the distant goal is to implement integration of org-lint into > flycheck/flymake. And we do need user-level config for which checkers > should be enabled for "full" org-lint check and for "quick" check on > the fly then. I am unfamiliar with flymake, but since flycheck checkers run in a different Emacs process, the patch I sent is sufficient. FWIW, I have been using an org-lint flycheck checker for several months now. The code for the checker, if curious, is adapted from <https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/pull/2031>. If flymake doesn't use a different Emacs process and your goal is to be able to support it easily, it makes sense to extend the current API in a manner similar to what you proposed. -- Suhail
