Suhail Singh <suhailsingh...@gmail.com> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >> This would work, but it modifies the checker list destructively. > > Yes, as does org-lint-add-checker. In the same vein, > org-lint-remove-checker is intended to be able to undo the "effect" of > one or more org-lint-add-checker invocations.
Indeed. But I wanted to nudge you to do a bit better :) >> What about introducing some kind of selector variable instead? > > That could also work; there is more than one way to achieve the end. > However, I am not convinced that it's the "better" approach. It's > altering an existing API for, what I deem to be, little value. A new custom variable is not altering the existing API, it is extending it. The extension is also not entirely out of nowhere - `org-lint' already accepts a list of checkers as an argument. Further, the distant goal is to implement integration of org-lint into flycheck/flymake. And we do need user-level config for which checkers should be enabled for "full" org-lint check and for "quick" check on the fly then. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
