On 12/07/2025 04:40, Jacob S. Gordon wrote:
On 2025-07-10, Max Nikulin wrote:
I know about MathML almost nothing, so it is hard for me to reason
if it is really necessary and what issues its absence may cause.
Me neither. Based on what I understand from the spec, it can affect
line breaking and semantics. If I get a chance I’ll look at this more
closely and follow‐up with the `LaTeXML` folks.
It is a valid aspect. I expected that it affects vertical alignment of
nested indices in some applications.
There is an issue with MathJax export: "<>&" characters are not are
not converted to "<" and similar entities.
On 2022-11-06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Could you please elaborate about refactoring […]?
Just closing the loop on [Ihor’s question].
See
Max Nikulin. Re: [BUG] Escaping "<" and ">" inside math blocks when
exporting to HTML/MathJax. Sat, 12 Jul 2025 17:30:59 +0700.
<https://list.orgmode.org/35e280df-52b6-493e-83c5-70a57b931...@gmail.com>
Jacob, do you know anything about mathtoweb? Org manual and docscrings
recommend it, but I am unsure if it is still proper suggestion.
I would consider adding to `org-latex-to-mathml-convert-command' easy
customization options with predefined commands for pandoc and latexml
(without siunitx.sty). Ideally, lazy "auto" option that uses available
executable should be implemented.
There were some complications with custom nested \newcommand in
particular and LaTeX preamble with custom .sty files in general:
Myles English. [odt] regression in using an equation sourced via
latex_header. 2011-11-01 16:10
<https://list.orgmode.org/871utr7rj3....@gmail.com/T/#u>
I have never tried export of a remote file, e.g. /ssh:host:/...
Conversion command might be available either on local or on remote
machine...
