Hey Ihor, On 2025-07-12 13:40, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > What would be the benefit of MathML if MathJax is _also_ loaded?
I don’t think there’s much benefit of having MathML+MathJax *over* LaTeX+MathJax, as the results should be very close. Unconditionally loading MathJax would just put the MathML syntax on equal footing with LaTeX w.r.t. MathJax accessibility features. (Page reflowing is definitely still noticeable, but less dramatic). The advantage I see is conditional loading, which can smooth over rendering issues in problematic browsers. > I think it is the same with MathJax? Or am I wrong? You could be right; I was still under the impression CSS had to be loaded through style objects in JS. > I think that I need to ask an important question here: what is your > goal? Is it just a curiosity exercise or do you want to improve > MathML support in Org? Fair question from the tone of my message! My goal is to improve MathML support in Org. And to make things clearer, I’m only advocating for the second approach with the `org-preview-latex-process-alist` machinery. Thanks, -- Jacob S. Gordon jacob.as.gor...@gmail.com Please avoid sending me HTML emails and MS Office documents. https://useplaintext.email/#etiquette
