On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up.  I like the idea of
> a worg/org-contrib/babel/images directory and will put my images there.  I
> suppose it doesn't have to be all one way or the other, but I can imagine a
> time down the road when the babel documentation directories become cluttered
> and hard to use.
>

Tom, thanks for this. I moved my babel language tutorial images here. I like
this system. For other tutorial/page author, it might be nice moving forward
to give the images a helpful name. I titled mine
"gnuplot-image-description.png." This way, other authors know what page the
image refers to. Just a thought.


John


>
> Tom
>
> On Sep 20, 2010, at 5:07 AM, John Hendy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr>wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Should this be the standard practice now? Images for something in Worg/
>> > org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc_*.org should be kept in the same
>> directory?
>>
>> I'd suggest this: images linked to only one file should go in the same
>> directory than this file, images useful for several files could go in
>> the images/ directory.
>>
>>
> Actually -- sorry... I was just going to change this and wanted to re-ask
> what others think. For example, I currently have 7 images of plots in
> worg/images/babel/. I titled them gnuplot-imageName.png to try and make them
> easy to spot.
>
> Were I to switch to the "new system", would it bother anyone to have a
> bunch of image files no in worg/org-contrib/babel/languages? Does anyone
> else care if the directory is filled with both org files and images? Or
> would anyone prefer a worg/org-contrib/babel/images directory since the
> supporting files for babel are growing with all of the documentation being
> written?
>
> I guess it doesn't matter much to me; I just hesitated before updating as I
> wondered what everyone else thought and might have stronger preferences
> about directory "clutter" and unity with file types and such.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> John
>
>
>> > Also, is there a list of the directories that are published and those
>> that are
>> > not? For example, I also put a downloadable example file here:
>>
>> The only directory that is skipped at export time is FIXME/.
>>
>> > I'm just wondering if the Worg instructions on how to contribute should
>> include
>> > a directory tree of some sort so that the newer contributors like myself
>> are on
>> > the same page as everyone else?
>>
>> I hope the recent updates on worg-setup.org can help newcomers find
>> their way :)
>>
>> Don't hesitate to suggest other improvements!
>>
>> --
>>  Bastien
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to