[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It has not been my intent. I do get a bit upset by some type of >> answers and you are right, it is then in the eye of the beholder. I >> can understand if Eli feel a bit hurt. He took long time to write a >> long answer and I just pointed to some a little bit weaker points in >> the answer. > > IMO, there are _no weak points_ in Eli's message. > > In one sentence: > > "All software have bugs, so to ever make a release, someone must > decide when enough is enough". > > Sadly RMS does not see it that way either ... so we'll probably never > see a release, no matter how close we get to one (unless of course, > people stop reporting bugs in the pretests, even when they find one).
I will not be surprised at all if we will see after the release a flood of problem reports currently held back by a large release pain threshold. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
