On 2010-01-24, at 17:54 , Davide 'Folletto' Casali wrote:
> 
> The advantage should be a cleaner separation between smart folders and 
> sources and also a more powerful way to use the part you prefer (unavoidable 
> without the splitting UI).

We all have very diverging views on what the source list should carry. You're 
imposing a lot of structure with splitting, hiding panes, etc.

I'm for a fully customizable source list, built by dragging items from a second 
window. This window is akin to Mailsmith's mailbox list. Basically, it lists 
all mailboxes in all accounts, in their existing structure, plus any smart 
searches you have saved. (Mind you, you may want to save searches only so you 
can have their name available as a set to other searches.)

So, on first launch/setup, you start with a pretty plain and reasonable view of 
your folders as any other IMAP client would show you.

Then you realize you can drag things out of it, and you get notice a tiny 
button at the bottom that opens the mailboxes+searches window. (could be a pane 
substitution, replacing the list+message view, but uhhh mehhh not sure.)

Make sense?


> 3. I think that PDF is a good format to work on layouts, but I've never used 
> them in a completely open community project, so let me know. I can export in 
> other formats.

I like what you're doing with them, but hand drafts work just as well.


> 4. At some point I think that this process must be integrated with the wiki, 
> I just don't know at this time which is the best way to proceed. Let me know. 
> :)

The unspoken rule is: Things from the list end up documented in the wiki. 
Things created on the wiki don't often make it back to the list for discussion.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com

Reply via email to