On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Xavier Morel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2010, at 12:18 , Jared Earle wrote: > > > > Yes, go with the flow, because like it or not you're going to receive *a > lot > > * of HTML email. You're going to reply to some of it, too. > > Why would that mean you *have to* reply in HTML as well? (emphasis added) If a writer uses bold and italic for emphasis, like I added to your statement above, it's not your place to remove that and strip his text of meaning and context. While I'm for enforcing better values on a user, I'm not in favour of extending that emphasis on others that haven't opted into Letters. Also, if you're replying to a thread where some people use one client, others use another, and the overall effect is that some of the commenters are differentiated only by colour or weight of text. When you strip these imposed values, you're removing legibility from the mail. No-one likes the guy who does that out of spite, and that's what we'd be doing. -- Jared Earle :: There is no SPORK [email protected] :: http://jearle.eu Hosting :: http://cat5.org Blog :: http://blog.23x.net
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
