On Jan 29, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Jared Earle wrote: > If a writer uses bold and italic for emphasis, like I added to your statement > above, it's not your place to remove that and strip his text of meaning and > context. > > While I'm for enforcing better values on a user, I'm not in favour of > extending that emphasis on others that haven't opted into Letters. > > Also, if you're replying to a thread where some people use one client, others > use another, and the overall effect is that some of the commenters are > differentiated only by colour or weight of text. When you strip these imposed > values, you're removing legibility from the mail. No-one likes the guy who > does that out of spite, and that's what we'd be doing.
So...why would that mean you'd have to **reply** in HTML? Timothy Collett -- To be great is to be misunderstood. ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
