On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:55 PM, John C. Welch wrote:
> 
> On 1/29/10 1:44 PM, "TGC" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> It's not significantly uglier than raw HTML, and since you think that's
>>> perfectly acceptable to force onto people, I figured you'd like to meet
>>> someone who might agree with you.
>> 
>> John, is it really necessary to be so very snide, just because someone
>> disagrees with you?
> 
> When people are insisting on insane workarounds and overcomplicating
> everything to the point of absurdity, snide is an effective tool to point
> that out. It not only points it out, it reflects my opinion of said
> workarounds and overcomplications in a clear manner with little room for
> doubt. I find the entire idea to be ridiculous, in a "mongoose flying an
> F-16" kind of way. The party scene from "Labyrinth" is less ridiculous than
> that idea and it had Bowie in that bizarre wig.

It is also very rude, and completely disregards the fact that other people may 
have different opinions than you, and still not be completely and utterly 
wrong.  Frankly, if I were running this list, I'd have booted you from it long 
ago--not because of your opinions, but because of how you belittle everyone who 
doesn't subscribe to them fully.  Have you ever heard the saying, "You can 
catch more flies with honey than with vinegar?"

Also, that wig was hardly bizarre as Bowie went.

Timothy Collett

--

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com

Reply via email to