On 29-Jan-2010, at 04:43, Jared Earle wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Xavier Morel <[email protected]> wrote: > Why would that mean you have to reply in HTML as well? > (emphasis added) > > If a writer uses bold and italic for emphasis, like I added to your statement > above, it's not your place to remove that and strip his text of meaning and > context.
Perfect example; removing meta-data willy-nilly can be quite rude. If Mail.app behaved better and its "Use the same message format as the original message" worked properly all the time, I'd use it. (Yes, I had to change prefs just to reply to this email). That does bring up a suggestion though. Even when viewing in 'plain text' it might be useful if that 'plain text' somehow preserved <strong> <em> <b> and <i> tags for displaying? -- 'It's easy to hold everything in common when no one's got anything.' --Maskerade
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
